Anne Broache | Mar 09, 2008
Dozens of exhibitors at Europe's largest gadget confab were in for a surprise
this week: Suspecting patent violations, German authorities raided 51 booths,
carting off cell phones, navigation devices, and other gear that allegedly
infringe on patents.
According to
an
Associated Press report Thursday, more than 180 police and customs officials
took part in the bust, which affected 51 exhibitors at
CeBit in Hannover, Germany.
Of the accused, 24 were from China, 15 were from Taiwan or Hong Kong, nine were
from Germany, and the others came from Poland, the Netherlands, and Korea.
The police didn't name which people or companies were targeted, but they did
say the alleged patent violations deal with devices that have MP3, MP4, or
digital video broadcast functions; DVD players; and blank CDs and DVDs. They
managed to fill 68 boxes with gadgets, documents, and advertising material and
took down the identities of nine people, most of whom were reportedly
cooperative. Patent police raid booths at CeBIT tradeshow.
The raid was a response to a rising number of "criminal complaints by the
holders of patent rights in the run-up to CeBit," and the patent holders had
warned the accused companies in "good time" about their lack of licenses, police
said, according to the AP.
When word of the raids first trickled out Wednesday, rumors started flying
that an iPhone "clone" made by
the Chinese electronics
company Meizu was one of the targets. But, as it turns out, a portable MP3
player that Meizu makes, not the Mini One smart hone, was the subject of the
investigations, according to
reporters on the
scene.
Could we expect to see something similar go down in the middle of next year's
sprawling
Consumer Electronics Show
in Las Vegas? (This is assuming--only for the sake of argument--that any patent
infringements might occur.)
Short answer: Probably not.
US officials regularly conduct raids in which they seize certain goods
because of intellectual property violations--
pirated Microsoft software, for instance, or
mod chips that allow video game consoles to play pirated games. But the key difference is that
those exercises deal primarily with copyright or trademark violations. There's
no equivalent seizure authority under US patent law.
"Because of the difficulty in determining issues of patent infringement, we
don't have criminal prosecutions (or raids or seizures) for patented inventions
(unlike trademark counterfeiting and copyright piracy which are easier to
determine)," a United States Patent and Trademark Office spokeswoman told CNET
News.com in email.
Because it's generally impossible to look at a product and tell whether it's
infringing on a patent, famously unsexy American patent lawsuits are generally
resolved through complex court proceedings that may lead to fines against the
infringer and injunctions barring use of the contested invention.
Things are a bit different when US patent violations by international firms
are concerned, but they're still not quite the same as what reportedly
transpired in Germany this week.
Federal law gives US customs agents the power to seize imports of goods
that have been found to
infringe on US
patents.
"You can get an order from the International Trade Commission in the United
States barring any importation of a product that infringes a US patent," said
Gilbert
Kaplan, a partner with the Washington office of King & Spalding who
specializes in international trade and intellectual property law.
Sometimes, a US patent holder who has won an infringement suit can also
seek a temporary restraining order from a US district court that similarly
bars imports of infringing products. Unlike in the Germany situation, however,
those cases aren't in the investigatory stage: A decision has already been
reached about whether a certain patent has been infringed.
Seizures ordered by the ITC typically occur at the border, when packages and
containers are inspected by customs officials. Kaplan said he wasn't aware of
any cases where customs agents had blustered into a tradeshow, but "they do
have that right", he said. "So (those ITC orders) theoretically could apply to
these kind of infringing imports if they happen to slip through at a trade
show."
Practically speaking, that may be hard to pull off because "you'd have to
have a lot of warning that shipments are coming in", said
Fabio Marino, a
patent partner in Orrick's Silicon Valley office.
"I'm aware of other situations where that has happened in Europe, but I've
never heard of it happening in the US," he said of the CeBIT raid. "There is
no criminal provision under the US patent laws."
Via
CNET News blogs
To post comments, you need to become a member. It's FREE.