Bookmark

Digicams and imaging myths busted (Part 1)

By Leonard Goh
June 13, 2008

There are many misconceptions about digital cameras and imaging. Some of them have been around since the dawn of photography, while others surfaced with the digital revolution. It's easy to believe the hearsay when you've heard them often enough, but most turn out to be faux when investigated. In this two-parter, we will explore the common myths and legends of digital photography and bust them just like how Clint Eastwood busted the bandits in the Western spaghetti Man with No Name. See more hearsays dismissed at our second installment of this series.

Myth 1: Expensive cameras let me shoot better pictures

We say: This common misunderstanding applies not just to digital cameras, but other items as well--tennis rackets, cars, etc. While an expensive camera usually sports the most advanced features and cutting-edge technology, having all of them doesn't necessarily ensure better pictures. The trick here is to identify the features that matter and match them to the cameras you are planning to buy. A keen eye for aesthetics usually helps, too, but you can go further by applying basic photography techniques. Like some pros will say: It's not the camera that makes the picture, but the person behind it.

Myth 2: Higher pixel count equates to better image quality

We say: As much as having more pixel resolution allows for larger prints, it should be noted that the size of the camera sensor also plays a critical role in determining the quality of images. Unfortunately, the sensors in most compact or even prosumer snappers are smaller than those in a dSLR. When you try to cram too many pixels into a small area, chances are the image quality will be sacrificed. This is easily understood if you look at two similar-resolution pictures--one taken with a compact shooter, the other with a dSLR of the same resolution.

Myth 3: Every imaging problem can be solved in Photoshop

We say: Whoever came up with this theory must either be a bad photographer or a very lazy one. Sure, Photoshop can lighten up some shots, sharpen them or even remove blemishes. But there are limitations to what you can patch up with the software. Besides, you really don't want to edit every one of the 300 images you shot during your vacation. You can save some time by better understanding your camera controls and using the appropriate settings.

Myth 4: RAW format is for pros only

We say: We admit it can be slightly intimidating to work with RAW files, but the programs that are bundled with cameras these days make post-processing easier. This gives more creative controls even to amateur photographers. However, do note that the RAW format takes up more space in the flash card, though we think the tradeoff is worth it.

Myth 5: Scene modes are for dummies and I am not.

We say:It may be the case in the past, but point-and-shoots now are so advanced that it can recognize facial features and much more. The pre-programmed modes contain information on every kind of photographic situations there are possible, and most cameras are intelligent enough to apply the appropriate settings to achieve optimum exposure, color and contrast.

« Back to Digicams